BIF crap shots

Still learning how to shoot BIF, most of photos taken at ISO 3200, F6.3-F8, 1/3200s. All photos are not much details.

1)
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

2)
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

3)
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

4)
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

5)
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Sorry for wasting your times to viewing it. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Not bad already... me bif... will cannot see bird....... else is total blue....

Superb bif shots, more please....

Wow great BIF already, especially #2 and #4.
I still couldn't get these BIF shots...

Huh...wee far, you know my standard lah, BIF means plain BG with no bird one! I think I must start learning also, Byram is a good place to begin. You have the most difficult birds to start with, they are for professional level, I will start with the seagulls !

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Very good liou.
My one.

more more

I tabik you all with such BIF action. I tried oledi, can't even get the bird inside the frame due to extreme narrow field of view

very good already...
can not compare singapore one, they have less tree , more light...
and if you make it small pic for iphone, actually still very sharp!

Thanks everybody for the kind comments.

irfanchoo wrote:very good already...
can not compare singapore one, they have less tree , more light...
and if you make it small pic for iphone, actually still very sharp!

i need at least A3 size of images, sadly not able to print it.

JKC wrote:more more

6)
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

7)
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

BIF can never be easy.....don't believe??? Try start with handheld of a 600mm lens....hahahaha

Mr No Good wrote:BIF can never be easy.....don't believe??? Try start with handheld of a 600mm lens....hahahaha

that's why nowadays peoples want the new lightweight 600mm/f4/is/II...

Hehehe maybe 300mm 2.8 weefar

horukuru wrote:Hehehe maybe 300mm 2.8 weefar

Agree! will look for new 300/2.8/is/II weight lighter about 30% compare old one.

like 3, 4